Sony Cybershot DSCW300 Digital Camera

Approval Rate: n/a%

n/a
Approval ratio

Reviews 4

Sort by:
  • by

    sgoncalves

    Fri Oct 31 2008

    Great camera. There is even a mode for VGA pictures. Don't buy into the hype that more is better. My wife could have gotten away with a 90 dollars Sony instead of this one. All she does is take pictures and email them. What a waste of money. However this camera when I use it is great. When you take photos of mountains in the distance they disappear in your photo. Probably due the small lens. Not enough light. Anyway this is a great camera for all around pictures. Distance shots? Get an SLR or something with a lens bigger than a dime. Don't get me wrong ALL compact cameras are gonna have pretty much the same quality with a tiny lens. Just remember what you buy it for. My Panasonic sub SLR 5MP takes better pictures outdoors.

  • by

    marceloedelste_in

    Sun Oct 12 2008

    Sony Cybershot DSCW300 13.6MP Digital Camera with 3x Optical Zoom with Super Steady Shot

  • by

    gregbostrom

    Thu Oct 09 2008

    This is a great camera. It does so much. Most people who write reviews for say, cameras, haven't taken the time to read the manuel. This camera does everything it promises and more. The only draw back at all is in the movie mode you can't zoom in and out while your filming.

  • by

    esouza

    Mon Oct 06 2008

    Given the list of criteria that matter most to me for a point and shoot digital camera, I seem to keep coming back to a Sony model as much as I try to explore the field when I'm in the market for a new camera. This time around as I was preparing to update from the Sony dsc-p200 I've had for 3-4 yrs, I wanted a more pocketable formfactor, optical image stabilization, closer macro focus, higher MP rating while maintaining at least the level of image quality I get from my current P&S;, continued access to manual control of shutter and aperture and, finally, a wider angle + longer telephoto range. Tall order it seems in the P&S; category. At first I rejected the w300 because of its pedestrian 35-105 mm focal length, though it had everything else I was looking for, but subsequent investigation didn't turn up many other options that didn't offer some other tradeoff. When it came to evaluating the relative merits of the various tradeoffs I determined that the focal length wasn't my grea... Read more

This topic is on the following list(s)

Add to new list